Hey guys, thanks in advance for taking the time to read this and respond. I’ve read through your updated platform ideas and all of the additions and adjustments to it. I have a concern though that the idea of establishing a committee, admiralty board, and task force is just going to mire the club in unneeded bureaucracy. For one thing I’ve always been under the impression this club is founded upon the idea of being casual and having fun. I have seen when the politics becomes “serious business” and all, but for the vast majority of members that aspect doesn’t hold much meaning. My second thought is that we most likely don’t have enough people interested in holding these positions or the ones who would want to might have to double up. Finally an inclusivity task force seem to me to be like a morality police. While I agree that ensuring STF is a place where everyone needs to have a social environment to be themselves without discrimination, I feel uncomfortable with dictating what is and isn’t acceptable beyond common decency. I’m also unsure of what such a taskforce would be able to do that TECH or the Executives wouldn’t be able to do in the face of a problem like that.

So with explaining my thoughts and impressions, let me get to the question part.

Why do you feel that establishing more advisory or regulatory groups are necessary?

How do you plan to incentivize people to join these groups?

Will it be allowed for people to double or triple up if there isn’t enough interest? Will it be allowed if that’s what they want despite not needing to?

Do you plan to make the positions electable or by Presidential appointment?

Perhaps it’s unfair of me to say it like this, but what sort of reach would the morality police have in disciplinary action? Would it be subject to the approval of the President?

What checks and balances would be in place between all of the potential groups as well as the existing ones?

Captain Matt Evans