Remove Tag?

Do you want to untag yourself from this post?

Engineering Department

Discussion - Modern Navy Plan

Posted by Captain Philip Graham (Engineering Director) in Discussion - Modern Navy Plan

Posted by Captain Philip Graham (Engineering Director) in Discussion - Modern Navy Plan
I would like to open the discussion on the Modern Navy Plan. The stated goals and questions to be asked are below.

  1. Does the Community believe that the Modern Navy Plan currently provides adequate guidance for ship builders.

After reviewing the MNP I see a few holes in the system, There are Cannon Tech that are not included into the charts. I believe that for new Ship Builders the Guidance does not provide adequate guidance.

  1. Does the Modern Navy Plan need to be updated?

I believe that the MNP could at a minimum utilize a Update with Equipment from sensor’s to Phaser Cannon’s (USS. Defiant utilized them) I believe there is a overall longer conversation on these.

Cannons are covered under descriptions of the phaser section fyi you just then apply it to the phaser type numbers.

  1. What are the Specific Issues you view with the Modern Navy Plan

We describe “Large Ships” By crew member’s. But if you were to build a cargo vessel which only required 10 crew members, but that was the size of the Mythology it would under the current plan still be a “Small” ship. Several Cannon ships could not be built under the current MNP. It should be noted that the MNP is approaching 20 years old.

To clarify no MNP is not approaching 20 years old its less then 7 or so at most, new navy plan before that was in use since around 2004ish i think and before that was only SSSF someone still around in those dark ages can further clarify if they feel the need.

  1. Do you have a solution for the problems that you see in the Modern Navy Plan.

As we look at the vessels we need to be thinking in the right terms. Warp Drives are not just for propulsion but actually create the power for the entire vessel. Warp drives are not limited by the “weight” of the vessel as in a zero G setting there is no weight specifically, instead we are discussing the “mass” and power consumption. A solution for this would be

A. Revamp the system to look at mass for ship size, each piece of equipment would be assigned a certain mass.
B. List for each piece of equipment the energy consumption (in simple terms), list the total energy output for each warp drive.
C. List mass for crew quarters & other departments,

While I agree a new system is needed personally i’m a little hesitant to drawing up power requirements as there is little information on how much energy draw various systems work at. It also creates more work for the designer in making it ‘non tech friendly’. I do think basing it on the size of the ship equating to crew except in special cases like cargo ships etc might be more viable.

For all of the above issues it would require a programmed Spreadsheet or equivalent that would be able to add these up for designers. Therby making the entier process easier.

  1. Does the Modern Navy Plan allow for the creation of Cannon like Vessels.

As stated above I do not believe that it does.

Philip Graham
EDir

Just some input from the former EDir Phillip I felt would be useful.

Robert Archer

Use the full posts index to browse this ship's thread list.

Open Full Posts Index