Remove Tag?

Do you want to untag yourself from this post?

Engineering Department

Discussion - Modern Navy Plan Revisions

Posted by Rear Admiral Robert Archer (Engineering Director) in Discussion - Modern Navy Plan Revisions

Posted by Joe P in Discussion - Modern Navy Plan Revisions

Posted by Rear Admiral Robert Archer (Engineering Director) in Discussion - Modern Navy Plan Revisions
The following discussion is a final check over from previous discussions over the past two terms. This discussion entails the opening paragraph of the MNP only.

[Snip]

Pardon me for being rude and not reading the text, but how exactly do you get away with calling this a “final review” when it’s something nobody has talked about for two terms?

Joe

Because the changes proposed were agreed upon after several others in those two terms, so this is a final review of this section (which is very minor if you check the log, the other sections need more review but this least then lets us check this part off)

Robert Archer Edir

Well, excuse me for being a dick here, but your assertion that “everybody agrees to it already” is the very thing I’m wondering about. Because I participated in these discussions quite a bit and don’t recall agreeing to change an opening paragraph. I mean, I don’t remember much of anything, despite the fact that I was the one who pointed out the problem in the first place.

I mean, the entire original point of this review was to replace the entire notion of classifying ships based upon their size, because that system made it impossible to create ships that were consistent with other canon designs. I can’t say whether or not the opening paragraph is good or not without knowing how you actually intend to fix it. It seems like you’re keeping it exactly the same, so to me it seems like we’re going to have exactly the same problems absent any other information about what it is you intend to do here.

Joe

Use the full posts index to browse this ship's thread list.

Open Full Posts Index